We've been exploring homes for a bit now, and it has become clear that a home with about 1800 SF would be ideal... and you would prefer not to need to take on any major projects with your new home.

But, on the very same day, we see two new listings that are meet and don't meet those goals at the same time.

House #1

This house is 1600 SF (smaller than your goal) but it is in incredible shape. Updated kitchen, fresh bathrooms, everything done just as you would have done it. You wouldn't change a thing. 

House #2

This house is 2400 SF -- more room than you ever thought you'd have -- but the house is dated. The carpet seems to be 20 years old, the kitchen feels tired, and we won't speak of the bathrooms.  The house isn't falling apart, but it will be a project.

Which house would you choose, if either?

If you lean toward House #1, you probably value your time and energy more than square footage right now. Maybe life is busy during this season of life.  Maybe you know yourself well enough to know that some of the projects won't ever get finished.  Perhaps a smaller but extremely move in ready home is a better option than a larger home needing many updates.

If you lean toward House #2, you might be thinking more from a long-term perspective. Maybe your family will grow, or an aging parent might eventually move in with you.  You might covet the extra space for flexibility and know that you can always work on those renovations over time.  The home's condition can be improved, but the square footage can't be increased as easily.

Neither choice (space, or condition) is right or wrong for every buyer -- but we'll want to talk through the strong pro's and strong con's of each potential house.

And... you might decide you aren't willing to compromise on either home, and we'll keep waiting for another option that is closer to your goals for both size and condition of your next home.