
Would it surprise you if I told you
an architect thinks you should build a custom designed home? Probably not. Sorry, Charles. :)
In discussion with Charles (ok, virtual discussion, on Facebook) Charles Hendricks, an
architect in Harrisonburg, raised the following perspective....
You will pay more per square foot for a custom home. However, if you design a home with only the square footage you need, right sized room, and limited hallways you reduce the premium. If you add energy-efficiency into the equation you further reduce the difference. If you add in maintenance of systems you further reduce the difference. I argue, as you might expect, the best value is custom design.So, yes, I admit -- I agree with Charles, and here's the basic concept....
House 1 - a 4000 SF home for $550K. Some rooms that you might not end up using much or using well. Some rooms that are too large. Some rooms that are too large. You paid $137.50 / square foot.
House 2 - a 3400 SF home for $550K. Every room and space in the home is one that you need and will use well. No rooms are too small. No rooms are too large. You paid $161.76 / square foot.
So, yes, with House #2, you are getting less "value" in the conventional sense of the price that you paid per square foot of home that you purchased. But many would quickly understand that House #2 might actually have much more value in that it would (nearly?) perfectly fit your life, lifestyle and needs.
An interesting perspective
Charles, thanks!