scott@cbfunkhouser.com   540-578-0102 scott@cbfunkhouser.com540-578-0102Click Here for Help! Scott Rogers     Harrisonburg & Rockingham County Real Estate
Scott RogersScott Rogers
Newer Post home Older Post

Which segment of our market is more stable? Expensive homes or starter homes?
If you ask most people, you'll be told that starter homes are a much more stable segment of our market right now --- and that the higher end market is definitely doing much more poorly.

As it turns out, both markets are performing well, depending on how we examine the issue.

Starter homes are performing well!

Supply Trends

As you can see in the chart above, there is a much healthier supply of homes below $200,000 than in any other price range.  Put a few other ways:
  • It would take 10 months for all homes currently on the market under $200,000 to sell, as opposed to the 24 months it would take for homes priced above $400,000.
  • Each month 1 in 10 homes on the market priced under $200,000 is sold --- as compared to 1 in 15, 16 or 24 for the higher price ranges.
Yet at the same time, expensive homes are performing well!

Home Sales By Home Size
   *** 2009 total sales figures are extrapolated from Jan 1 - June 15 data.

Of note, the decline in home sales in our market has not affected all price/size ranges in the same way.  Since prices change over time (homes shift into different price segments), I examined the change in pace of home sales by dividing our market into starter homes (0 - 1499 SF), mid-range homes (1500 - 2500 SF) and large homes (2500+ SF).  You'll note that:
  • The pace of starter home sales has fallen 58% between 2006 and 2009.
  • The pace of mid-range home sales has fallen 58% between 2006 and 2009.
  • The pace of large home sales has only fallen 30% between 2006 and 2009.
So, while it almost certainly takes longer for larger homes to sell, it's not because there are fewer buyers seeking that product.  In fact, the buyers haven't fallen out of that price/size range nearly as much as they have disappeared from the starter home and mid-range sized home markets.
2 Comments so far . . .
Keston:
Dear Scott - you're right, the graphs present an apparent contradiction. Although I could think of several possible explanations, the most likely is that the correlation between size and price is not high. If it were high then one would expect your two graphs to corroborate. My guess is that many homes that are over 2500sqft sell for under 400k (or 300k for that matter), and those homes sell more quickly than their also big, but more expensive, counterparts. In other words, one should be more concerned about selling an expensive house rather than a big house. Another issue is that the 2nd graph is presented in absolute numbers whereas the first graph is presented in some sort of ratio. Without denominators, the figures in the 2nd graph could mask relative changes of supply among the different size ranges.
June 19, 2009 7:09 am

Scott Rogers:
Keston --- good point that the over $400k and over 2500SF data sets are quite different.


June 22, 2009 3:53 am

Add A Comment:

  Name (required)

  E-mail (required, not published)

  Website

Prove you're not a comment-spammer . . .

  


Newer Post home Older Post

Search by Street Address Search by MLS Number Search by Realtor Collapse the masthead Scott Rogers Scott Rogers Visit My Blog